patching...
Update: Lake Zurich Patch is on Facebook! "Like" us at http://www.facebook.com/LakeZurichPatch
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Poll: What Do You Think of the Lance Armstrong Doping Scandal?

Lance Armstrong was stripped of his seven Tour de France titles this week for taking banned substances.

 

Lance Armstrong was stripped of his seven Tour de France titles this week for taking banned substances.

A 1,000 page report by the United States Anti-Doping Agnecy (USADA) concluded that Armstrong's United States Postal Service team ran "the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping programme that sport has ever seen," BBC Sport reported.

The evidence cited by the USADA included evidence from 11 of Armstrong's former teammates. The USADA has created an entire website dedicated to the Armstrong case. The evidence cited includes financial payments, emails, laboratory tests that "further prove the use, possession and distribution of performance enhancing drugs by Lance Armstrong."

Armstrong has continued to deny doping, although he declined comment to the New York Times Monday. The International Cycling Union also decided that no one would replace Armstrong as the winner of th Tour de France between 1999 and 2005, the Hartford Courant reported.

Armstrong's appeal as an iconic athlete transcended cycling in part because he overcame stage three testicular cancer, which he was diagnosed with when he was 25, the New York Times reported.

Armstrong's recovery from cancer and his success in the Tour de France made him an international celebrity. He founded the Livestrong Foundation, which grew into a $500 million anti-cancer charity, the Daily Beast reported. Armstrong resigned as chairman of the foundation this week.

  • Has Your View of Lance Armstrong Changed?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes. He is a liar and a cheat. What he did was wrong and he earned a ton of money doing it.
        29 (38%)
    • No. Regardless of the doping allegations, Armstrong has done a lot of good for people.
        39 (52%)
    • No. I always thought he was a phony.
        7 (9%)
    Total votes: 75
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Armstrong doping scandal, Lance Armstrong, Lance Armstrong Cancer, Livestrong, and Tour de France

D'skidoc

7:34 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Every one of them "cheated". That is: They did what they could get away with. Lance was simply the "best cheater". He may not deserve those trophies, but then no one does. Might as well just disband cycling, because the culture of the sport is to do anything you can to win as long as you don't get caught. Lance only got ratted out, he never was proven to have cheated by any objective methods.

Reply

Linda

8:45 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I think he needs to pay back every cent that was ever given to him as we'll as his trophies -- once a cheater always a cheater !!

Reply

Mr. Rats

9:00 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Cheating is part of the sport but he's never failed hundreds of tests. The circumstantial evidence against him is overwhelming. He will suffer financially and the civil suits are lining up but it's not like the death penalty or something. He's just another in a long line of greedy cheaters who have contributed to the further decline in society in which the trust in our institutions as been eroded ever more. But if you look at baseball it bounced back, to some extent, so I assume cycling will too. After the civil suits, hopefully he'll lose it all and have to get a normal job like the rest of us.

Reply

victoria smith

9:02 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I think that there are more important issues to worry about instead of Lance and his "cheating. He had done so much possitive, but then again I am not sure why this was not found out alot sooner. He still is an amazing athelete no matter how you look at it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mr. Rats

9:11 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

He's done a lot of positive while lining his pockets. It's just cosmic justice that he'll lose a few pennies in this process. He'll still live way better than most of us so don't feel to bad for Lanc-y.

Comment_arrow

ib jorgensen

11:26 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Victoria....I agree there are more important issues to be dealdt with, like the cheating at the polling places and the Government that can't govern and cheating it's citizen for a balanced budget.....Hello !

Another Point

10:23 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Yes, "there are more important issues to worry about instead of Lance and his 'cheating'", but obviously we are so accustomed to superfluous issues of lying, we don't recognize the important ones anymore. I will suggest the culpable misconduct of the Obama administration as it relates to four murders in Libya as one recent example. Now, don't say that Lance's scandal has nothing to do with politics - everything is political! Once again proving that we care much too much about offending others and concern ourselves with what others will think if we challenge popular opinion. Don't be fooled, the media adopts role models/leaders for us and instead of vetting them properly (researching them Google doesn't count) we invite them into our hearts because it is journalism's job to do the research, right? And, if the person is portrayed as likable or emulating an ideal we desire to harbor we help finance their lies and their lifestyle. Yes, people can make mistakes, it's only human, but our biggest mistake (as a society) is that we accept opinions and feelings as FACTS. Lance had a good ride though, didn't he?

Reply

Soonwinner

10:49 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Tour de France, Giro d'Italia, and other major bike races. Over the last 50 or 75 years at least 50% of the winners were later found to be using narcotics. It is all BS. NFL, MLB and NBA were using narcotics and/or other drugs for years. Are we going to discard all those winners and championships? One common sense rule should suffice: If they do not find illegal substance use within a year then the book is closed.

Reply

Brian

11:20 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Its amusing that we take a fringe sport like cycling and vilify this to the point that people are demanding money back from the livestrong foundation. In the NFL people get a four game suspension for drugs, baseball is taking it a little more "seriously" with the 50 game ban, but you still have guys like Braun that wriggled of the hook and won the MVP.

If it's a sport we don't care about, we can make an example out of someone, if it's a major US sport, we slap you on the wrist and let you compete some more. What Lance did was not great and the worst part was that he had no problem throwing other riders under the bus for doping while he was doing it as well. But when he isn't even allowed to run in the Chicago Marathon? Really?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Kruger

11:30 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Right, Brian, but let's not stop there. How many of those involved in the massive Wall Street fraud -- much more serious in our everyday lives -- have gone to jail?

Michael Ioffe

11:21 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

During many years Lance Armstrong influent many young people of his time in glory.
Right now all people, who was in sport because of him mostly retired.
I do not see any good things to punish Lance Armstrong right now.
Is it new doping in sport?
It was before and it is right now. I doubt, that it will be gone in future.
Let play by rules and science in time, when it was, is and will be important and do not try to rewrite history.

Reply

Mr. Rats

11:44 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

For those of you defending Lance, it's not the crime, it's the hypocrisy behind it. It's just like Tiger Woods, who cares if he's a horrible husband but it was the hypocrisy of his "brand". If Tiger would have simply worn black and said yep I'm an A-hole, it wouldn't have been a story at all. In fact, he would have been even more elevated by the m"asses". You live and die by your brand.

Oh and by the way, he sure made a lot of money "helping" others. Others who now have to face the fact that you can't really make it without "help", wink, wink.

Reply

Teresa Caldwell

12:08 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I think it is disgusting what lance armstrong did. He IS a liar and a cheat. He deserves to be punished for sure.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Stephanie Price

12:11 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

He did in fact fail the very first drug test for the Tour de France that became his first win. His team covered it up by getting a doctor to write a prescription.......He has lied, and lied, and lied (and hurt many people along the way who were telling the truth). I loved watching him every year in the tour - before I found out he was cheating.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Brinkmann

5:23 am on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Not entirely accurate Stephanie---Armstrong passed all drug tests after his his 1st tour win in 1999---it wasn't till 2005 when testing for EPO became more sophisticated that one his remaining 1999 urine samples was retested for EPO and found to be positive---the allegations however never amounted to much based on accuracy of a dated sample couldn't be 100% proven---and Armstrong countered by stating there was no way to prove it was his sample or the possibility that someone may have tampered with it---Armstrong was cleared of any wrongdoing at that time...Only now after current evidence so overwhelmingly proves Armstrong of being a cheat can the 2005 accusation (regarding his1999 win) be considered accurate

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Stephanie Price

7:11 am on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

John, he failed the first test given BEFORE that race.....his staff covered it up by getting a doctors prescription (after the test results came in) to cover it up.

Comment_arrow

John Brinkmann

10:22 am on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

all good Stephanie but I think were on different 1999 pages here---I think your referring to the saddle sore issue where Armstrong allegedly had a bogus prescription written by a doctor claiming he'd used an approved steroid based saddle sore balm in effort to cover up a positive test for steroids during the race...and again, keep in mind there's no way to confirm these allegations as indisputable fact---but were on the same page overall and that being there's more than ample evidence now proving Armstrong cheated and he's a liar as well

Miss Rat

3:25 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Lance did not cheat. I guess if you all worked hard for something, excelled at it, and did great at it.....then, well you are all cheaters.

Reply

Louanne

3:26 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Lance did not cheat. I guess if you all worked hard for something, excelled at it, and did great at it.....then, well you are all cheaters.

Reply

Rob

3:53 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Obviously Lance did what the team Dr's, trainers and conditioning coaches let him or told him and his teammates to do. I highly doubt that the sophication of the cheating was orchestrated by an athlete training 12-16 hrs a day. He is being singled out because he was the best ever. The USPS Team should be banned, the trainers and Dr's should be banned and the athletes should lose their titles. But as far as Lance being singled out as the single offender....is offensive to anyone involved in high level sport.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Stephanie Price

4:03 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

He's not been singled out... there are lots of bikers who have been banned and had their titles taken away in the past couple years (Alberto Contador for one). Not only did he lie about taking performance enhancing drugs, he also is accused of blood doping - where athletes replenish themselves with their own blood midway into the Tour (this is not an easy way to cheat...you must have your blood drawn, store it and transport it over seas to use during the race).

Reply

D'skidoc

7:53 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Back to what I said at the beginning. Just the best among those who all followed the same mantra. Be the best you can be at whatever cost if you don't get caught. I don't believe it's about the money either, although that can't be a negative motivation. It's that crazy thing about being the BEST!. Some people will do "anything" in pursuit of that elusive feeling of power and superiority.

Reply

KC

8:15 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Another sad; "role model" for our younsters. We teach and preach to look up to those who work hard and play by the rules. What they are learning is "greed and the almighty dollar will change the rules those play by.

Reply

winston williams

8:58 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I think that if lance Team mate was never cut and was winning tours ,nobody would have to say lance is part of that ,i think that this guys after departing from lance Team had to do all kind of thing to get in top 10 ,so when the Question is asked of you ,you just bleam lance ,so why because lance said that he will not be challengeing it again ,that's when they saying that he is doing it ,you guys just want lance to keep challengeing it .
If it is true that lance dope,the best rider to hold that title is Thomas vockler .

Reply

Millie

7:33 am on Monday, October 29, 2012

There is probably cheating of one kind or another going on every day in Sports. As long as the fans pay the high ticket prices and goto the games. Nothing will be done. One league runs tests on everyone another does it at ramdom.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian

8:20 am on Monday, October 29, 2012

Again, the problem here is it is a fringe sport so as fans of sports, we have no problem vilifying him more than ever other athlete that has cheated. Same with track and field or other Olympic sports. Tiger, while not cheating at the sport, only lost a few sponsors and some notoriety. Merriman (of the Chargers a few years back) was suspended for four games for Steroids....for his punishment he still got votes for defensive MVP. MVP of the MLB all star game this year, Cabrera. Because of his great play, the Giants got home field advantage.

This stuff happens all over sports. It's how guys win now, especially in cycling. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_doping_cases_in_cycling
Look at the list and tell me if Lance beat normal competition. I'm sure there were some and they were finishing way out of the podium spots. How is it that much worse when a cheater beats a bunch of other cheaters? I still recognize his accomplishments....he's just a dirt bag (which a lot of people knew without steroids.)

Brian Brehart

9:17 am on Monday, October 29, 2012

Personally, I still don't think he did it. All the evidence is circumstantial, and why, after 10+ years of investigating him, do we suddenly have all these "witnesses" who are so willing to testify against him? Where were they 10+ years ago?
I'm sorry, call me naive or blind or whatever you want, but the fact is that the man went through test after test after test and passed. This was a witch hunt and they weren't going to stop until they found something or someone to help "prove" Armstrong did anything to enhance his performance.
But it's fine, the organization got what they wanted: Lance is disgraced, they've destroyed a hero to many and eliminated every good work the man ever did. Livestrong is irreparably damaged and Nike had to disassociate themselves from Armstrong. And for what? To say that he "cheated"? Well good for you.
How's that International audience for the Tour De France now, BTW? Seeing the same numbers as before now that Armstrong is no longer competing? The fact is Armstrong single-handedly put cycling back on the map, and this is how they repay him.

Reply

D'skidoc

9:22 am on Monday, October 29, 2012

Maybe they should just suspend those rules and let the fastest cyclist win? No holds barred. Genetic manipulation. Blood doping. No helmets. Lobotomy. All fair game.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian

10:15 am on Monday, October 29, 2012

Might be a little far. Might. I do see no reason why they can't handle it like baseball did. A few asterisks and better enforcement and penalties for new users, although it is still a far cry from perfect. The public doesn't mind the extreme because it is a fringe sport. Bar him from ever competing in anything again, strip his titles, vacate everything he's done, ruin a charity because he doesn't play baseball and his name isn't A-Rod...who didn't admit anything until he was caught. All he did after he came out was keep his crazy salary, his job, his titles, and all his previous awards.

Me

10:37 am on Monday, October 29, 2012

Why aren't all professional athletes stripped of their records when it is discovered that they are doping? Are baseball and football somehow different that we can allow Barry Bonds to retain his records and his earnings? It is sad that Armstrong has been singled out as the one who needs to pay. The witch hunters should all be proud that they have sacrificed Livestrong in their quest for the truth.

Reply

Malibu Bob

3:18 pm on Monday, October 29, 2012

The "sport" of Bodybuilding (if you could call it a sport) and other weight and strength-related sports rely heavily on growth hormones and steroids. It's been a known fact for years that one cannot succeed unless you've pumped yourself up with roids.
The people in charge of those sports (like the Weider family) has turned a blind eye for years. That's why drug-free bodybuilding (the NPC) is more accepted than contests that Arnold (Ahnuld) and Weider produce.

Reply

Mr Chael

8:02 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

It's beyond me how some are defending this loser. This bully finally got punched in the nose by those who stood up to him and his croonies and there's a lot of them behind the scenes! Job well done.......now wouldn't it be nice if some of that money he gained unfairly over the years be distributed evenly to those pour souls that he went after and attacked over the years to show their efforts weren't all for not. If it weren't for those few individuals that stood up the charade and bullying would still be continuing. They are the true heroes, not the cowards who remain silent or those who enabled this to continue this long....or want to continue the status quo!

Reply

Virginia Llorca

3:46 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

Here is a parallel. A guy gets stopped for erratic driving. He says there was a bee in the car. He takes breathalyzer. No sign of alcohol at all. Goes home. Next day people come
to police station and say, "I saw him drink five martinis."

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Stephanie Price

4:34 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

I can understand why people would stand by Lance BEFORE all the evidence came out. But now it's time to go by the facts. As the article says: The evidence cited includes financial payments, emails, laboratory tests that "further prove the use, possession and distribution of performance enhancing drugs by Lance Armstrong."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian

7:38 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012

It's not really a defense of him that I am behind. He does seem like a sleaze who probably cheated to win. But when everyone else was cheating to win as well, some indicting themselves in going after Lance, how does that make him worse? Especially now that his charity, that has given nothing but money towards cancer research, is having people ask for their money back. We forget about A-rod, we forget about numerous football players, Bonds, Clemens, Sosa, we turn our heads away from MMA, body building, olympics and other fringe sports....Lance on the other hand needs to burn? It just seems a little silly to care this much about one guy and slap the rest on the wrist.

Again, he cheated...striping him of wins is fine, but making him out to be the worst athlete ever is a stretch, especially when he used his fame for such a great charity.

Leave a comment