patching...
Update: Lake Zurich Patch is on Facebook! "Like" us at http://www.facebook.com/LakeZurichPatch
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

New Direction on Downtown: All 4 Developers Rejected

Lake Zurich board agrees to sell surplus, village-owned downtown property instead.

 

 

Monday’s Lake Zurich village board meeting started with a call from residents to move forward with downtown redevelopment. Resident Dennis Abbott recalled days past when downtown was a vital, busy gathering place; he urged the board to eschew apartments and choose  David Smith of Southshore as the developer. Chamber Director Dale Perrin urged the board to choose a development with commercial and retail. “Be bold; be daring,” Perrin told the board.

However,  Lake Zurich village trustees could not come to a consensus on a single developer for the village owned parcel on Main Street, that faces the Promenade and lakefront. After nearly two hours of discussion, the board determined to take a different route and start declaring vacant downtown properties as surplus and sell them off.

“My goal tonight was to come to some sort of resolution.  This is the last thing I expected to happen,” said Village President Suzanne Branding after the vote.

The only trustee who voted against selling the land, rather than choosing a developer, was Terry Mastandrea.

After the meeting, Branding said she wondered if trustees might regret the decision.

“It was a little bit crazy the way this happened. This has never even come up before; it has never been talked about,” Branding said. “It wasn’t very well thought out.”

Branding said she believes there are some vacant parcels the village should sell.

“There are lots broken up and split up that  wouldn’t lead to any huge development. I could see selling that, but to put everything on the block; it’s a little bit strange,” Branding said. 

Prior to that decision village trustees discussed the four developers vying for developing Block A and Branding asked each trustee if they could name their top choice. 

Mastandrea and Jonathan Sprawka initially wanted to go forward with two developers; when pushed to choose one they both chose Southshore. David Smith of Southshore’s plan was for rerouting Main Street and creating a gathering space with restaurants, and retail. Trustees Tom Poynton and Rich Sustich chose developer J. Moises Cukierman’s plan, which was primarily residential with luxury apartments.  Trustee Dana Rzeznik chose Richard Sova and Landover, but then switched to John Breugelmans of ARDE, a mixed-use development with commercial on the ground floor and apartment/condominiums above. Trustee Jeff Halen said he was not comfortable going ahead with any of the developers.

Although the plan for the meeting did not include developers addressing the board, Breugelmans, Smith and Sova were present and were allowed to address the board. 

Sova addressed the board and explained why the developers want exclusivity before moving forward with studies.  He told them that normally a developer puts a piece of property under contract before spending money on things like soil borings, marketing studies and rezoning.

“ In this case, the developer does not control the property;  you do. We’re reluctant to spend a lot of money on something that may or may not happen,” Sova said.

Sova’s comment sparked the idea to sell the property. Trustee Sprawka suggested selling the property and other village property as a way to ensure that the developer has the financing and will go forward with the project. The consensus of the board was that surplus property, including Block A, should be sold. 

“It’s  not a failure on the developers' part; it’s a failure on our part of the process. The developers came forward with great plans. I’d like to see it put up for surplus and I’d like to see every one of you at the table gobble it up,” he said. 

Related Topics: Downtown Redevelopment, Lake Zurich Village Board 2012, and downtown development

ginny wagner

7:14 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Are you kidding me? I am so disappointed in this decision. Who is running the show? Why is the leadership of Lake Zurich so fractured? I have watched the process of a plan for our downtown unfold for over 24 years. Many people have spent hours and hours coming up with ideas and paving the way. What is the problem? We have some dynamic, smart people as trustees; yet, as a group, you are totally incompetent! I look at downtown areas like Roselle, Elmhurst, Glen Ellyn, Wauconda...towns much older than ours. They have mananged to carve charming, vibrant downtowns and they are moving forward! Our high school was amoung the top ten in Lake County. Will future residents take a look at the villages of Lake Zurich, Barrington, Libertyville , Lake Forest and make comparisons? Wake up trustees! Listen to your residents...take a leap of faith and move forward with a planned downtown, not a bunch of individual pieces of property.

Reply
Comment_arrow

K Moritz

3:55 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Love this comment! Dead on. I've lived in Lake Zurich for 27 years and I am SO dissappointed in how run down this vibrant town has become. Very embarrassing. Wauconda has done an amazing job with their waterfront and downtown. Lake Zurich...take a peek and take notes while doing it! Come on already!

Comment_arrow

Janet Putbress

8:59 am on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Ginny - I agree with you 100%.. one reason I left. The politics/local government cannot get their act together. I worked hard at improving the school district, coming on during a very difficult time. As the District smoothed out and stepped up.. I thought the village was going to step up as well. It's time for all of them to reflect on the big picture. It is an embarrassment to see what could have been.. and what it is. Without a plan and without leaders who cannot take the leap of faith that is needed, Lake Zurich will continue it's decline. There are so many wonderful people in LZ who believe in community. Too bad.

Comment_arrow

Disgruntled

2:54 pm on Friday, August 31, 2012

Ginny,
Who's running the show? Nobody - that's the problem
Why is the leadership so fractured? It's not, only because there is no leadership.
Don't blame the trustees. They ask for things that never happen.
Your comparisons would be fine but all that could have made LZ like the others have been bulldozed (ancient history). Planning a downtown and a planned downtown are two different things.
How about "Lead, Follow or get the ___ out of the way"

Penny Therrell Claiborne

7:51 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

So let me get this straight. The parcels of land that the town made people move from, to "develope", are now going to the hight bidder? Where someone fought to keep their home is now a free for all? Wow.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Vortex

10:43 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

That's an excellent point Penny, I'm sure there will be lawyers lined up to file suit against the village as soon as the dust settles.

Comment_arrow

C W

8:23 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

I always thought selling property obtained by eminant domain was illegal.

JF

8:25 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Right on Dale Perrin, "Be bold, be daring." Right on Ginny, "...take a leap of Faith." Right on resident Dennis Abbott, "Choose David Smith..." Right on Terry Mastandrea and Jonathan Sprawka, "David Smith of Southshore’s plan was for rerouting Main Street and creating a gathering space with restaurants, and retail."

What the heck happened? Smith's plan would provide a reason for 18,000 EXISTING residents to visit downtown. And draw people from other communities too. Most of the other plans had a singular focus on building residential condo-units that would add 100 to 150 new residents. But little or no focus on retail or restaurants. The result would be those new residents would then drive to Deer Park or Wauconda or Kildeer or wherever to dine and shop like the rest of us already do.

Honestly folks. 100 to 150 new residents (alone) will do little to revitalize the downtown ... because those silly little numbers won't motivate a serious small business person (restaurant or retail) to sign a lease downtown and begin operations. No way. You need to think about a way to draw the existing 18,000 residents, and thousands from other communities, to the downtown. Often. And that takes something bold. Like Smith’s plan with serious restaurant/retail goals.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paul

9:30 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

I am 1 of 18,000 EXISTING residents of LZ and try to support the downtown area businesses as much as possible. Old World Bakery, Johnny's Shoe Repair, Delicious Redd's, My Flavor It Place... are all frequent stops for Me and my Family. Both of my kids are involved and enrolled in the Park District Pre-School, activities, sports, and community events. I am proud of my community and therefore want to support it as much as possible, but...

Lake Zurich's Downtown does not come close to offering what neighboring communities can offer in regards to shopping, dining, and social events. Deer Park, Wauconda, Arlington Heights... I could go on, are all places I visit to enjoy great food, shopping, and entertainment.

I am 1 of the 18,000 EXISTING residents who would love to visit Downtown LZ even more frequently and be able to invite all our friends and family to join us in the incredible experience that Downtown LZ could offer!

Kathy

8:31 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

This is really sad … and embarrassing for this community. It seems there are personal agendas guiding the decisions and they are motivated by money. The Village will sell the land, a hand full of individuals (probably not LZ residents) will make money, and the “downtown” area of Lake Zurich will remain a depressing eye sore. It’s very sad.

Reply
Comment_arrow

K Moritz

4:00 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Sad is an understatement...

Erik Lambertsen

8:42 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Unbelievable! "We can't come to an agreement so we'll just give control to whomever has the most money." That's brilliant. I really hope that the trustees are not planning on serving anymore terms. This is the the best example of incompetence that I have ever seen. PLEASE, Lake Zurich citizens, do not let this happen without consequence.

Reply

Heather

8:47 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

This IS crazy! I've lived in LZ for 30 years and can't believe the condition of the down town area. We should model after those communities listed in the other post; there's always foot traffic. But I will tell you this, like it or not, trendy bars with good food will draw people; however because LZ has a historty of targeting patrons leaving a bar NO ONE will want to come. I live here and I won't drink in this town. They could put a Star Bucks down town, duh! That would draw people. It's not brain surgery; but appreaently some of the trustees could benefit from it!

Reply

DaddyO

10:38 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Our village idiots (trustees) are incompetent and an embarrassment. They have had their time, now its time to run them ALL out and start again.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DaddyO

10:41 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Branding along with her stubbornness and lack of vision needs to go ASAP!

Vortex

10:42 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

In the absence of leadership you get knuckleheaded decisions like this one. The developers were probably all relieved; after what they've already been put through by this board and the mayor, can you imagine what a disaster our elected officials would have made of a major development project?

Reply

Resident 225

11:05 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

My disappointment is difficult to express. I have lived here for 25 years, raising my family and participating in the community. To see such disregard for the job these trustees were elected to do is sinful. Is there a way to rescind this decision and get back to developing a vibrant downtown? I certainly hope so. Where's the new Village Administrator's advice on this?

Reply

ev3

11:56 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Sounds like a case of too many cheifs and not enough Indians. Someone needs rise from the ashes like a phoenix and take charge of this ludicrous fool's errand. Take charge, delegate, execute. If you were my project managers, I would fire the lot of you.

Reply

Lead Follow or Get Out of the Way

12:54 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Considering our mayor owns that bustling B&B in downtown LZ, you would think she would want to have some interesting and viable restaurants and shops in the downtown area. I can't imagine her $190/night guests taking a leisurely walk past the vacant storefronts to watch the game on a torn stool at Scoreboard, enjoy a dog served by the ever friendly counter help at Redd's, a Flavor-it treat (If it'open), wedging themselves into a booth at DiPiero's, or lunching at a wobbly Formica table over at The Koffee Kup. Our officials need to advocate for what is best for the CURRENT residents of the village (not the ones they hope to attract) and not throw in the towel because they are tired of trying to figure out what to do about it. Perhaps the village calls for volunteers for man a task force whose charge is to find viable businesses who could locate to the downtown area. Clearly Wauconda has been able to convince 1 or 2 establishments to take a leap of faith and take a chance on their town.

Reply
Comment_arrow

K Moritz

4:09 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Love this "virtual walk" through Lake Zurich... There is so much potential and yet there it sits...being wasted and aging rapidly for the supportive residents of our town.

BearDown

1:21 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

This is unbelievable!!! DON'T FORGET OUR TRUSTEES JUST HIRED A CONSULTANT TO GIVE THESE MORONS ADVICE ON WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN DOWNTOWN. Is there anyway we can petition some of these irresponsible individuals out of there positions??? I drive through downtown everyday, I am a resident, and completely disgusted at the way it looks and how this has been handled. How could this happen? I'd love to know how many of the people on the Village Board have Lake Rights? Seems like the people that either live on the lake or have lake rights have based their decision on protecting it! #GETTHEMOUTNOW!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Trustee

7:58 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Sure, run for the village board, petitions are out this fall for next April's election. The village board needs you!

ginny wagner

1:35 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Are you listening Lake Zurich "leaders"? I suggest that everyone who has commented on this post please discuss with neighbors and friends in Lake Zurich. Let's keep this discussion alive and make the "leaders" explain their actions. There needs to be some accountability. This is our money they have spent and are spending!!!

Reply

Frustrated LZ Resident

1:41 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Speechless. This is a great example of lack of leadership as and entire village board. AND, Branding has to take some responsibility for not having paved the way for the right decision before it all happened in what sounds like a haphazard fashion. Sell the property to highest bidder? To do what with? Who knows? Maybe it stays vacant like the old Kmart, Blockbuster, lakefront corner 12 & Old Rand, and the list goes on. How does that add up to a 'revitalization' plan??

Reply

ginny wagner

1:46 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

I am showing my age....but all I can think of is quote from a '70's movie, "Network"---
"All I know is that first you've got to get mad. You've got to say, .... My life has VALUE!' So I want you to get up now. I want all of you to get up out of your chairs. I want you to get up right now and go to the window. Open it, and stick your head out, and yell, 'I'M AS MAD AS HELL, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS ANYMORE!' I want you to get up right now, sit up, go to your windows, open them and stick your head out and yell - 'I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!' Things have got to change. But first, you've gotta get mad!... You've got to say, 'I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this anymore!' Then we'll figure out what to do about the depression and the inflation and the oil crisis. But first get up out of your chairs, open the window, stick your head out, and yell, and say it: "I'M AS MAD AS HELL, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS ANYMORE!"

Reply

BearDown

2:01 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

WE NEED TO SETUP A FACEBOOK SITE SPECIFICALLY ABOUT THEIR INCOMPETENCE. ONLY WAY WE WILL BRING IN THE MASSES. FOLLOWED UP BY A TWITTER ACCOUNT. NEED TO GO SOCIAL WITH THIS ONE. WAY TOO IMPORTANT! THE RESIDENTS NEED TO SHOW UP TO THE NEXT MEETING!

Reply

Penny Therrell Claiborne

2:09 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

True bear but my belief is we have to organize first. They will just shut us down if we go to their meetings. We need to form a residents group and make them come to us. I come from a tiny rural town in the south with a thriving downtown. They gave residents low cost business loans to start shops downtown. They got residents together along with churches and boy and girl scouts to fix up buildings. We pay so many taxes in the north and require so little out of them.

Reply

Hopeless in Lake Zurich

3:01 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

I am one of 18,000 existing residents, and I will continue to spend lots of money at places like Arlington Heights downtown, The Glen, Lincolnshire and Deer Park. All of those places laugh all the way to the bank when they watch the incompetence of Lake Zurich leadership. The only good thing to happen to LZ in over ten years of living here has been Beelow's Steakhouse - wouldn't it have been nice to have that downtown?? But obviously the owner had to open it where it is at because our downtown is a total joke and embarrassment.

Along with the other 18,000 residents, we'll all continue to spend our money elsewhere. I hope all of these trustees know they will never get re-elected after this bozo move.

Reply

Phil Barcini

3:37 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

While it's fun to insult all of the Bozo's in Village Hall, remember that they are descended from a long line of clowns who have been wasting money for the past 15 years and have nothing to show for it but debt & more taxes on those who live here.
So many have claimed to be visionaries. They would have seen this train wreck coming if they really had good vision.
Don't blame them all. Some have tried to ask questions & be responsible. Those who ask questions are labeled obstructionists. No more Facebook rant pages, PULEEZE!! Show up at meetings & demand accountability.

Reply

Mike

3:45 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

This town is a joke, we lived here and moved here hoping for a great downtown area (look at Arlington Heights, Naperville, Barrington...) why couldn't someone follow suit? The whole board has no idea what they are doing and they should get more educated people to try and run the town, anything will be better than all of these fools. Can't wait until the lawsuits start coming for this land. HUGE DISSAPOINTMENT! People will be moving now as they look at this village and say look at this embarrasing town!

Reply

jeannine nasca

7:18 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Disapointed, but I'm not surprised by thier actions. I went to several board meetings in support of David Smith as he brought his plans before the board, and I saw downright derision on the faces of a majority of the board members faces. When we vocally voiced our support we were chastised by Bob Vitas. David Smith has humbley gone before the board many times just to be shot down repeatedly. I agree, we should all go public with this and make this known to all Lake Zurich residents. Maybe we can start by showing up at the next board meeting.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Trustee

7:56 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Remember that two trustees voted for Southshore!

Comment_arrow

Disgruntled

3:46 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Remember Janine that Smith was given 2 years to accomplish "something". In that time, he accomplished none of the required tasks. He made promises & NEVER delivered. He swore he had money but NEVER was able to show it.
Vitas never chastised anyone. Vitas told Smith to "Show me the money" yet he never could.
In this "round", Smith could proceed without Village support yet he has not.
If David Smith wants credibility, he needs to put up or shut up. At some point, enough is enough!!

JF

7:36 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Still angry over here. Made my first comment at 8:25 this morning. Now it's 7:35 p.m. and I'm still blown away by the failed leadership of Branding and all the trustees. Do we really need 6 trustees and a so-called president to do nothing? Suggest we scale that back to 2 trustees and a president. Would the results be any worse with 2? Not joking here. Imagine the savings.

Reply

Trustee

7:54 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

JF, The Trustees are paid $3,000/year, the mayor makes $10,000/year and is the liquor commish.

Claudia failed to capture the story appropriately (typical for Patch, they like to sensationalize for their parent company, the Huffington Post). The board couldn't reach a consensus on proceeding with a developer, likely due to being burned in the past. The new path of declaring the property surplus will likely result in action much quicker than languishing through the red tape and secret agendas (mayor doesn't want condos or retail, just a cultural arts center). The property needs to be declared surplus prior to sale, which is a formal board action that still needs to take place. It isn't over.

If David Smith and ARDE have the money, the property will be available for them to purchase, thus triggering the revitalization of downtown Lake Zurich and getting the village out of the landlord business!!!!

Please attend the meetings to voice your opinion.

Reply

Trustee

8:05 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

For those interested in running.
December 17-24, 2012 Filing period for candidates seeking election at the Consolidated Election, April 9,
2013. [10 ILCS 5/10-6(2)] (Petitions may NOT be circulated prior to September 25, 2012.) [10ILCS 5/10-4]

http://www.elections.il.gov/Downloads/ElectionInformation/PDF/2013CanGuide.pdf

Reply

Trustee

8:19 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

3C petitions should be a Village Hall in September, can't start circulating until the last week of September.

Reply

JF

8:42 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Trustee. Thanks for listening and clarifying. We're all obviously pissed at decades of inaction. I'd love to attend meetings, but I've got a house full of kids and a job that I'm desperate to keep. So making time is nearly impossible.

I'm just guessing here but I bet the majority of those in attendance at meetings are retired or semi-retired residents whose goals and lifestyle are different than mine. So this Patch site is my only way to communicate. Branding has failed at issuing regular newsletters to keep us informed by the way. A cheap solution would be to email the dang newsletters. But that takes vision and effort.

Anyway, my family and I have been frustrated for more than a decade that we can't enjoy the lakefront. So I go to Wauconda and spend my time and money in their downtown. Please tell me the trustees have been to Lindy's in Wauconda to see how it's done right? The place has something for everyone ... including right-on-the-lake dining and an area for little ones to play in the sand/lake, and a spot for moms and dads to enjoy a drink and admire the lake happenings and watch the kids. Not sure the retired and semi-retired folks in LZ think about the benefit / attraction of such things. And BullDogs ... wow. Note we go to Deer Park, Kildeer, and Palatine too. I don't want to be too harsh on the places downtown LZ. It must be rough. Let's just say they don't compare favorably to the other options in nearby towns.

Reply

Trustee

8:22 am on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Branding, Halen, Sustich, Mastandrea, Sprawka

Reply

Claudia Lenart

10:24 am on Thursday, August 23, 2012

For those of you who would like to go to village board meetings, but can't afford the time, did you know you can watch the meetings online? Here is a link to the Aug. 20 meeting. http://www.volz.org/index.aspx?NID=260
The village also has a YouTube channel, although the Aug. 20 meeting is not on there yet.

Reply

TheJET

1:36 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

For those interested in bashing, I suggest a few facts:
1. The media does not give you all the facts. Sometimes, they cover what happens in the meeting, not the background. Sometimes, they don't tell if your way or my way.
2. Those who wish to bash the board about ESG, might I remind you that Smith had 18 months to produce something yet had produced nothing. There's more to that story as well.
3. Surplussing the property is part of the mandated process to sell it. That does not necessarily mean cash price tag. It must be sold under a competitive bid process with a minimum selling price. Only after that can it go on the open market.
4. For those cynical about the return from a sale, I'd suggest any price would be better than the $10 per parcel (you read that right) that ESG could have paid.
5. This is not an answer or end to the issues. It's just refreshing to see someone say "Let's do something to stop wasting time and money."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Resident 225

3:10 pm on Friday, August 24, 2012

I think it's unfair to say the David Smith produced nothing. He had a plan and he asked for two more weeks to finalize his funding. Vitas made sure that the Trustees would not extend the two weeks. Who knows where this project would be if they had waited those two weeks. Maybe no where but it was a better bet than what we have now. I have lost patience with the lot of them except for Mastandrea. He at least voted to select a developer. His actions appear to lean toward moving forward. Also, if this is such a good idea why wasn't it done long ago before another consultant was hired to "study" our options? Did the consultant recommend this move? And I can't believe Jet that you think it's refreshing to see someone say let's do something to stop wasting time and money. The residents have been saying that for YEARS!! By your statement it's obvious that you and Trustee have not been listening. This is a debacle that Branding and her cronies campaigned to fix. They haven't fixed a thing, just got us further behind. Jet, your facts are your version and frankly it's time to get people to the meetings and raise hell. If you can't make a meeting call the trustees, email the trustees, write them a letter just let them know how you feel. It was much easier to attend a meeting before Branding when the meetings were held every Monday. But, she's the champion of transparency...yeah right!

Say it isn't so

1:43 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Let the election begin!- Need four votes to get anywhere, so lets start with three trustee's - Are the trustee's by district or at large?

Reply

TheJET

2:24 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Trustees are elected At-Large, my 3¢.
Need a full slate of candidates, plus one 2-year term (Mastandrea is a full-in).
Caution - dispite criticism, there is a lot of work to do the job right.

Reply

TheJET

4:40 pm on Friday, August 24, 2012

Resident 225,
It is fair and accurate to say that ESG produced nothing in the 18 months.
It is refreshing that someone has insisted moving the whole TIF instead of one piece and that the law is finally being followed. It is also great to see Consultants' reports being followed (I agree, for a change). I'm not saying anybody has done a good job or that this is a solution.
The flaws in all of the proposals are too great to be addressed here. I don't believe in "doing something even if it's wrong" mentality. All of the developer propaganda is just that, including how they are going to be the financial savior. Pay attention to your tax bills & you will see that none will accomplish that.
I have been critical and vocal since the TIF began. That includes past and present administrations. I can show you the real facts with no emotions attached, so long as it was not a back-room deal.
It would be refreshing to see people at the board meetings, knowing the details of the matters and speaking intelligently on the subject. It would be nice to hear people ask for objectivity, rather than just lobbying for something.
It would be nice for someone to attend the meetings & know what happens. I get lonely!!

Reply

Jodie

10:48 am on Sunday, August 26, 2012

If anyone is considering running for office please have knowledge and a vision so that we don't waste more time. The downtown area doesn't need any more residential apartments or condos. We need retail, restaurants etc. It would be nice if the village invested in a ferry boat to offer rides on the lake that would attract people. All the vacant buildings need to be torn down already. Buy loosing control of the property - the downtown area will continue to look like shit so let's stop this sale from going through.

Reply
Comment_arrow

TheJET

2:51 pm on Sunday, August 26, 2012

Jodie, I agree with your concerns. Nothing is being sold yet.
The sale process is mandatory by law but ignored in the past.
Conditions of Sale does not mean losing control. It does mean all of it will be addressed instead of worrying about only one piece.
It does mean that a bunch of amateurs cannot micromanage affairs for which they know nothing. A look at the past decade shows how to goof things up.

Say it isn't so

5:01 pm on Sunday, August 26, 2012

Jodie - One of the biggest reasons why we have what we have is because NOBODY votes!- This past March the voter turn out was 22% county wide- Lets assume that everybody who voted cast a ballot, either yes or no for the electricity smoke screen. The total number of votes was 2430. In the last census LZ has a 19,709 population, taking the ballots into consideration thats 12% of the pop. Yes I know that includes kids but its not even close- In all of ELA township 26,624 people voted which is close to the 22% of registered voters. These trustees walk right in... The whole downtown needs to be replatted. relocate street and get the Park District to pony up with some land and you have a shot at it.... Another reason nobody big is interested, permit costs, brain damage from building department and the police department. Take a look at the Dimucci property, 1.5 million PER YEAR will go to Lake Zurich schools with no additional students. Dont you think that will relieve the dependency on us? 70% of our tax;s goes to LZ95. Was there anybody at the hearings from LZ supporting it? I guess I was the only one. GET INVOLVED!

Reply

goodlife

9:57 am on Monday, August 27, 2012

The Dimucci property just spreads the crap stores all over the area. I get the taxes, but revitalize downtown, yes-like Wauconda, Crystal Lake, ect... And people will want to LIVE here. The taxes we pay go to our very good schools. Its not all about money. Its about quality of life. Community.

Reply

Cheryl T. Eisenhuth

8:09 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

So let me get this straight, the board has mis-managed the downtown revitalization & can't work together to get the project done, so now we are just going to give up and sell off the property so that it's somebody else's problem and we have no control over what they do with it ? That's not a development strategy that's a cop out. Get your heads out of your backsides and get together and make it work. There is absolutely no reason the board can't come to a consensus on a development plan which THEY requested, from one of 4 developers. If one of the plans needs some tweaking than do that, but get moving on improving Lake Zurich's downtown today! Everyone in this community wants to see Lake Zurich live up to it's potential, doesn't the board? If this were a private business, it would be out of business and the board members would all be looking for work!

Reply

Leave a comment